<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Claude-Code on Eric Irwin</title><link>http://ericirwin.io/tags/claude-code/</link><description>Recent content in Claude-Code on Eric Irwin</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><managingEditor>Eric.Irwin@gmail.com (Eric Irwin)</managingEditor><webMaster>Eric.Irwin@gmail.com (Eric Irwin)</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://ericirwin.io/tags/claude-code/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Borrowing from Team Topologies to Make Sense of Claude Agent Teams</title><link>http://ericirwin.io/posts/borrowing-from-team-topologies-for-claude-agent-teams/</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>Eric.Irwin@gmail.com (Eric Irwin)</author><guid>http://ericirwin.io/posts/borrowing-from-team-topologies-for-claude-agent-teams/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There&amp;rsquo;s a habit I can&amp;rsquo;t turn off. Whenever I&amp;rsquo;m working on something — whether it&amp;rsquo;s organizing a project, structuring a team, or just figuring out how to approach a problem — my brain immediately goes to: &lt;em&gt;what&amp;rsquo;s the optimal shape for this?&lt;/em&gt; What information needs to flow, and between whom? Where are the boundaries?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s the kind of thinking that Matthew Skelton and Manuel Pais gave a name and a framework to with &lt;em&gt;Team Topologies&lt;/em&gt;. If you haven&amp;rsquo;t read it, the short version is that it offers a set of mental models for how engineering teams should be structured — and not around org charts, but around the flow of value. How teams communicate, where cognitive load sits, what interaction modes make sense for a given type of work. It fundamentally changed how I think about engineering organizations, and honestly, it&amp;rsquo;s one of those frameworks that keeps paying dividends years after you first encounter it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The AI-First Engineering Pattern: How Persistent Context Turns Claude into a True Teammate</title><link>http://ericirwin.io/posts/the-ai-first-engineering-pattern/</link><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>Eric.Irwin@gmail.com (Eric Irwin)</author><guid>http://ericirwin.io/posts/the-ai-first-engineering-pattern/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="introduction"&gt;Introduction&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Building a platform like Swoop means juggling a mobile app, dashboards, APIs, infrastructure, and — more recently — AI agents. Over time, I built a workflow using Claude Code that treats all of it as one intelligent workspace: a single place where code, data, operations, and testing are deeply connected.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The key insight: AI becomes genuinely useful when it shares your mental model of the system.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When architecture, tooling, and context are explicit, Claude stops acting like autocomplete and starts reasoning like a teammate who understands your entire environment. This isn&amp;rsquo;t about clever prompts — it&amp;rsquo;s about teaching your workspace to think in context.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Quiet Evolution of AI Tools: From Autocomplete to Workflow Bridges</title><link>http://ericirwin.io/posts/the-quiet-evolution-of-ai-tools/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>Eric.Irwin@gmail.com (Eric Irwin)</author><guid>http://ericirwin.io/posts/the-quiet-evolution-of-ai-tools/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;AI is one of the most polarizing topics in engineering right now. For some, it represents a threat to jobs or a black box risk; for others, it&amp;rsquo;s the next great productivity revolution. But beneath the noise, there&amp;rsquo;s a more subtle — and in many ways more exciting — shift underway: the evolution of AI tools like Cursor and Claude into customizable workflow partners.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instead of being just autocomplete engines, these tools are learning how to meet us exactly where we are. Through hooks, sub-agents, and local context, they&amp;rsquo;re becoming bridges across the many layers and abstractions engineers have to navigate daily.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>